Sunday, November 9, 2008
Poetry Response: Inoculation
I found Inoculation to be a very interesting poem indeed. Rather difficult to understand though. I think the writer is comparing small pox to slavery. He is making the point that slavery is like small pox and some do survive. The opening two lines set up the rest of the poem. “Cotton Mather studied smallpox for a while/ instead of sin. Boston was rife with it” The writer is saying he studies small pox, probably wants to help people when sin(slavery) is staring him right in the face, where he should really be helping people. He asks his slave if he has ever had smallpox. The slave gives a very interesting answer. He says that his mother tried to kill him with small pox. But the boy survived and became a slave for the man. The poem is rich with irony in that the boy survived small but was forced into slavery, worse than smallpox?
The Awakening: Chapters 24-28
Chapters 24-28
1. Who comes to visit and who all leaves?
2. Why does Chopin leave Robert out for this hefty majority of the book?
3. Do you think you react how Edna has reacted thus far in the book?
Is Edna truly in love with Robert? That IS the question. I have no flippin clue. Earlier in the book (chapters 15-19 ish) I would have argued no. But now, after she learns Robert is coming back and she is basically on a high, I have to think she is in love with him. I’m so confused! Is Edna just “awakening” or has Robert Awakened her? I think Robert (without knowing what he was doing) awakened Edna. Then Edna kisses Arobin. I think the woman is so confused and disoriented. I feel badly for her. Then there is foreshadowing when Mademoiselle Reisz feels her shoulder blades to see how strong her wings are. I know the ending so I know Edna’s wings are not that strong which bothers me a bit. I thought Edna would be a heroine in this book. She kind of annoys me and makes me want to clap my hands in front of her face and be like, “Buck Up”. She’s dithering about, waiting for Robert, giving off an air of elitist attitude, and not really doing anything. And because I know the ending I’m even more like, C’MON EDNA! Get it together woman!
1. Who comes to visit and who all leaves?
2. Why does Chopin leave Robert out for this hefty majority of the book?
3. Do you think you react how Edna has reacted thus far in the book?
Is Edna truly in love with Robert? That IS the question. I have no flippin clue. Earlier in the book (chapters 15-19 ish) I would have argued no. But now, after she learns Robert is coming back and she is basically on a high, I have to think she is in love with him. I’m so confused! Is Edna just “awakening” or has Robert Awakened her? I think Robert (without knowing what he was doing) awakened Edna. Then Edna kisses Arobin. I think the woman is so confused and disoriented. I feel badly for her. Then there is foreshadowing when Mademoiselle Reisz feels her shoulder blades to see how strong her wings are. I know the ending so I know Edna’s wings are not that strong which bothers me a bit. I thought Edna would be a heroine in this book. She kind of annoys me and makes me want to clap my hands in front of her face and be like, “Buck Up”. She’s dithering about, waiting for Robert, giving off an air of elitist attitude, and not really doing anything. And because I know the ending I’m even more like, C’MON EDNA! Get it together woman!
The Awakening: Chapters 20-24
Chapters 20-24
1. Who is Edna looking for?
2. What is the significance of Madam Reisz and Doctor Mandelet?
3. Why is Edna looking for Madam Reisz?
The end of chapter 19 illustrated for the reader Edna’s depression. The second to last paragraph described Edna’s “happy days”. The last paragraph described Edna’s unhappy days- days in which she did not care whether she was alive or dead. Then the next chapters describe Edna’s complete loss of care for the household and her family. I think Robert was only a catalyst for Edna’s awakening. She misses him but is bothered more by her place in the world.
Edna searches for Madam Reisz for numerous reasons. Madam Reisz is a widow, very dedicated to her art (music), and probably gives off the independent woman vibe- something Edna searches for fervently. While Edna searches for common understanding, Mr. Pontellier does the same.
Mr. Pontellier goes to the family doctor to actually inquire if Edna is right in the head. The doctor tells Mr. Pontellier it’s just a womanly mood and it will eventually pass. They laugh about women and how strange they act. I HATE when people do this- when you feel a certain way and people chalk up your feelings to PMS, lack or exercise, lack of sleep, inadequate diet, etc.
Okay, I’m off my soapbox now.
1. Who is Edna looking for?
2. What is the significance of Madam Reisz and Doctor Mandelet?
3. Why is Edna looking for Madam Reisz?
The end of chapter 19 illustrated for the reader Edna’s depression. The second to last paragraph described Edna’s “happy days”. The last paragraph described Edna’s unhappy days- days in which she did not care whether she was alive or dead. Then the next chapters describe Edna’s complete loss of care for the household and her family. I think Robert was only a catalyst for Edna’s awakening. She misses him but is bothered more by her place in the world.
Edna searches for Madam Reisz for numerous reasons. Madam Reisz is a widow, very dedicated to her art (music), and probably gives off the independent woman vibe- something Edna searches for fervently. While Edna searches for common understanding, Mr. Pontellier does the same.
Mr. Pontellier goes to the family doctor to actually inquire if Edna is right in the head. The doctor tells Mr. Pontellier it’s just a womanly mood and it will eventually pass. They laugh about women and how strange they act. I HATE when people do this- when you feel a certain way and people chalk up your feelings to PMS, lack or exercise, lack of sleep, inadequate diet, etc.
Okay, I’m off my soapbox now.
The Awakening: Chapters 15-19
Chapters 15-19
1. What important event occurs in chapter 15?
2. Why is it now that Edna realizes she likes Robert?
3. Why does Robert leave?
Unfortunately, I read the end of the book so I already knew Robert left for Mexico. HOWEVER, I did not know why Robert had left. It’s obvious Robert leave because he realizes he is in love with Mrs. Pontellier but knows he could never have her. Edna and her husband then leave Lebrun’s for the winter. Once home Edna becomes sullen, insolent toward her husband, and eventually throws a temper tantrum. I think Edna’s outburst is because she feels so impotent and stuck in her life. I think she misses Robert but her awakening isn’t about Robert. It’s about her trying to assert herself in the world as a woman who demands to be treated like an equal.
On that note, I found pages 42 and 43 very interesting. Throughout the book I got really annoyed whenever Madam Ratignolle or Edna were apt to a fit of some sort. Whether it was the heat, exhaustion, or some made up ailment, both women seemed to not be able to handle ‘life’ sometimes. I understand that these couple pages aren’t the best example of these women’s ridiculous ‘tired fits’ but I think Edna deals with Robert’s departure immaturely. I also think it’s odd that she trying to assert herself as in equal in the world but simply because she’s a woman she pretends to have exhaustion fits for attention.
1. What important event occurs in chapter 15?
2. Why is it now that Edna realizes she likes Robert?
3. Why does Robert leave?
Unfortunately, I read the end of the book so I already knew Robert left for Mexico. HOWEVER, I did not know why Robert had left. It’s obvious Robert leave because he realizes he is in love with Mrs. Pontellier but knows he could never have her. Edna and her husband then leave Lebrun’s for the winter. Once home Edna becomes sullen, insolent toward her husband, and eventually throws a temper tantrum. I think Edna’s outburst is because she feels so impotent and stuck in her life. I think she misses Robert but her awakening isn’t about Robert. It’s about her trying to assert herself in the world as a woman who demands to be treated like an equal.
On that note, I found pages 42 and 43 very interesting. Throughout the book I got really annoyed whenever Madam Ratignolle or Edna were apt to a fit of some sort. Whether it was the heat, exhaustion, or some made up ailment, both women seemed to not be able to handle ‘life’ sometimes. I understand that these couple pages aren’t the best example of these women’s ridiculous ‘tired fits’ but I think Edna deals with Robert’s departure immaturely. I also think it’s odd that she trying to assert herself as in equal in the world but simply because she’s a woman she pretends to have exhaustion fits for attention.
The Awakening: Chapters 10-14
Chapters 10-14
1. In what does Edna sleep?
2. What do the lovers and lady in black represent?
3. Does Robert consciously know what he’s doing?
A LOT happens in this section. Edna swims on her own, Edna meets Mariequita, and Robert and Edna go on a trip together. The sexual tension between Robert and Edna seems to have been amped up to a billion. Robert has to know what he’s doing and the same goes for Edna. Yet, Edna fervently denies (in her thoughts) ever consciously feeling sexual longing for Robert. They flirt and Robert touches her (fixes a ruffle, touches the hem of her skirt). I’m just waiting for the real deal to happen.
My favorite chapter is chapter 11 by far. Mr. Pontellier sees Edna sleeping outside. He decides he doesn’t like that so he tells her to go in side. Edna politely tells him no. Then Mr. Pontellier gets all pissy because Edna doesn’t do as he says. So he yells at her and tells her “to get inside this instant”. And Edna Straight Up Tells Him No!! And she says that if he speaks to her like that again! GOOOOO EDNA! AND THEN Mr. Pontellier knows Edna basically just asserted her position in their relationship so he tries to establish dominance by sitting outside with her. It’s as if he knows she wants to be alone so just to spite her he sits outside and smokes. I really dislike this man.
1. In what does Edna sleep?
2. What do the lovers and lady in black represent?
3. Does Robert consciously know what he’s doing?
A LOT happens in this section. Edna swims on her own, Edna meets Mariequita, and Robert and Edna go on a trip together. The sexual tension between Robert and Edna seems to have been amped up to a billion. Robert has to know what he’s doing and the same goes for Edna. Yet, Edna fervently denies (in her thoughts) ever consciously feeling sexual longing for Robert. They flirt and Robert touches her (fixes a ruffle, touches the hem of her skirt). I’m just waiting for the real deal to happen.
My favorite chapter is chapter 11 by far. Mr. Pontellier sees Edna sleeping outside. He decides he doesn’t like that so he tells her to go in side. Edna politely tells him no. Then Mr. Pontellier gets all pissy because Edna doesn’t do as he says. So he yells at her and tells her “to get inside this instant”. And Edna Straight Up Tells Him No!! And she says that if he speaks to her like that again! GOOOOO EDNA! AND THEN Mr. Pontellier knows Edna basically just asserted her position in their relationship so he tries to establish dominance by sitting outside with her. It’s as if he knows she wants to be alone so just to spite her he sits outside and smokes. I really dislike this man.
The Awakening: Chapters 5-9
Chapters 5-9
1. Who embodies perfection as the “mother-woman”?
2. In Chapter 6, what does the sea represent?
3. Do you like Madam Ratignolle?
These chapters further the story somewhat slowly. Chapter 6 is solely dedicated to describing Edna’s beginning of her awakening. Her and Madam Ratignolle visit the beach in which Chopin describes in length Edna’s feelings toward ber husband and her children. The most important quotation from this section I believe is when Madam Ratignolle asks Robert to leave Edna alone. I think this is important because Madam Ratignolle shows she’s not ignorant to Edna and Robert; she knows what’s up.
What I found really interesting in the section is when Chopin describes both Madam Ratignolle and Mrs. Pontellier. Chopin describes Madam R. as physically beautiful, like a Madonna. She describes Mrs. P as basically decent looking, but her grace and charm give her an aura that people find very attractive. What Chopin is trying to portray is Mrs. P has something more than just physical beauty about her.
1. Who embodies perfection as the “mother-woman”?
2. In Chapter 6, what does the sea represent?
3. Do you like Madam Ratignolle?
These chapters further the story somewhat slowly. Chapter 6 is solely dedicated to describing Edna’s beginning of her awakening. Her and Madam Ratignolle visit the beach in which Chopin describes in length Edna’s feelings toward ber husband and her children. The most important quotation from this section I believe is when Madam Ratignolle asks Robert to leave Edna alone. I think this is important because Madam Ratignolle shows she’s not ignorant to Edna and Robert; she knows what’s up.
What I found really interesting in the section is when Chopin describes both Madam Ratignolle and Mrs. Pontellier. Chopin describes Madam R. as physically beautiful, like a Madonna. She describes Mrs. P as basically decent looking, but her grace and charm give her an aura that people find very attractive. What Chopin is trying to portray is Mrs. P has something more than just physical beauty about her.
The Awakening: Chapters 1-4
Chapters 1-4
1. What main character opens the book?
2. Why does Chopin open the book with him?
3. Why do you think Chopin portrays Robert as so young both in years and socially?
The beginning of “The Awakening” introduced Edna’s and Mr. Pontellier’s relationship as both placid and full of blissful ignorance. Edna and Mr. Pontellier fulfill each others needs, offer each other polite conversation, and make a seemingly decent family. When Mr. Pontellier wants to go to Klein’s instead of be with the family, Edna does not protest and doesn’t even seem to really mind. When Mr. Pontellier gives Edna money she seems truly happy, exclaiming about buying presents for a friend.
The reader can interpret many things from this section. First, everyone, including Edna, honestly believes Mr. Pontellier’s behavior is not only perfectly fine but the norm. Edna doesn’t expect nor want him to stay and hang out with her and the kids. Everyone expects “the men” to run off and go play poker and drink while the women sit at home, raise the children, and do womanly things. One pivotal point in the book is in Chapter 3 when Edna cries. Edna does not know why she is crying or why she feels the way she feels. This is Chopin’s foreshadowing of Edna’s “Awakening.”
1. What main character opens the book?
2. Why does Chopin open the book with him?
3. Why do you think Chopin portrays Robert as so young both in years and socially?
The beginning of “The Awakening” introduced Edna’s and Mr. Pontellier’s relationship as both placid and full of blissful ignorance. Edna and Mr. Pontellier fulfill each others needs, offer each other polite conversation, and make a seemingly decent family. When Mr. Pontellier wants to go to Klein’s instead of be with the family, Edna does not protest and doesn’t even seem to really mind. When Mr. Pontellier gives Edna money she seems truly happy, exclaiming about buying presents for a friend.
The reader can interpret many things from this section. First, everyone, including Edna, honestly believes Mr. Pontellier’s behavior is not only perfectly fine but the norm. Edna doesn’t expect nor want him to stay and hang out with her and the kids. Everyone expects “the men” to run off and go play poker and drink while the women sit at home, raise the children, and do womanly things. One pivotal point in the book is in Chapter 3 when Edna cries. Edna does not know why she is crying or why she feels the way she feels. This is Chopin’s foreshadowing of Edna’s “Awakening.”
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Ok, this is actually my Section 2 blog
1. Who is narrating now?
2. What is Marlow begining to feel?
3. Why switch the narrarators?
I feel through this section the reader is starting to truly understand Marlow. Marlow got into this business of going to Africa because of his immaturity. He sought adventure, and was a 'seaman', he dreamed of conquering new lands. Africa caught his attention through the river. The river enchanted him like a snake and he was like a 'foolish bird'. Snakes eat birds. Marlow then sees some natives who are starving. He doesn't worry too much about it, but this does 'trouble him' just like the ship he sees firing aimlessly into the bush. These are the beginings of Marlows analysis of the morals of what he is doing.
2. What is Marlow begining to feel?
3. Why switch the narrarators?
I feel through this section the reader is starting to truly understand Marlow. Marlow got into this business of going to Africa because of his immaturity. He sought adventure, and was a 'seaman', he dreamed of conquering new lands. Africa caught his attention through the river. The river enchanted him like a snake and he was like a 'foolish bird'. Snakes eat birds. Marlow then sees some natives who are starving. He doesn't worry too much about it, but this does 'trouble him' just like the ship he sees firing aimlessly into the bush. These are the beginings of Marlows analysis of the morals of what he is doing.
Heart of Darkness, Part 1- Sections 1 & 2
1. Who narrarates for this section of the book?
2. What does the snake represent?
3. Why do you thin the narrarator mentions dominoes before Marlow begins telling his story?
The begining of this book was incredibly slow-going. Marlow is telling his story of his voyage into Africa. The image that struck me the most in this first part is the two women Marlow encounters when he goes to the company to get permission to head into Africa. One is fat and one is slim. The slim one is always intorducing new people to the fat one. Right before Marlow begins his description of these two women, he mentions an ominous feeling, "It was just as though I had been let into some conspiracy- I don't know- something not quite right." He then goes on to describe how the fat woman seems to look at everyone as if she knows them. Marlow believes she has a sort of 'unconcerned wisdom' about her. What do these two women represent? I can't pin it down exactly what i think these two women symbolize but my guess is the fat one is the devil and the slim one is humanity, specifically the people working for this company. The company keeps recruiting people to go into Africa, rape the land for its resources and people, and somehow make it out sane. This is devilish work, work that only makes profit and kills in the process. Some people go mad from 'working with the devil' so to say.
2. What does the snake represent?
3. Why do you thin the narrarator mentions dominoes before Marlow begins telling his story?
The begining of this book was incredibly slow-going. Marlow is telling his story of his voyage into Africa. The image that struck me the most in this first part is the two women Marlow encounters when he goes to the company to get permission to head into Africa. One is fat and one is slim. The slim one is always intorducing new people to the fat one. Right before Marlow begins his description of these two women, he mentions an ominous feeling, "It was just as though I had been let into some conspiracy- I don't know- something not quite right." He then goes on to describe how the fat woman seems to look at everyone as if she knows them. Marlow believes she has a sort of 'unconcerned wisdom' about her. What do these two women represent? I can't pin it down exactly what i think these two women symbolize but my guess is the fat one is the devil and the slim one is humanity, specifically the people working for this company. The company keeps recruiting people to go into Africa, rape the land for its resources and people, and somehow make it out sane. This is devilish work, work that only makes profit and kills in the process. Some people go mad from 'working with the devil' so to say.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Eveline
This story is about a girl who does not fulfill her dreams when she is finally given the chance due to an inexplicable feeling that possesses her.
1. Where is Eveline going to ship off to?
2. What is the parallelism of the line "And all the seas of the world tumbled about in her heart."?
3. Why do you think Eveline looks passively at Frank in the end of the story?
I could totally relate to Eveline in this story. At the end, when Joyce describes her as looking passively at Frank, I think Eveline is already over him. I don't think she ever let herself love him because she knew she could hurt herself. I also think that she has completely let go of him by the time he is on the ship calling to her. She knows she won't go. I think Eveline is a complex character. Joyce leaves little clues throughout the story to help the reader get to know Eveline. For example, he tells the reader that Frank loves Eveline but never Eveline loves Frank. That attention to detail changes Eveline's decision to not go at the end of the story.
1. Where is Eveline going to ship off to?
2. What is the parallelism of the line "And all the seas of the world tumbled about in her heart."?
3. Why do you think Eveline looks passively at Frank in the end of the story?
I could totally relate to Eveline in this story. At the end, when Joyce describes her as looking passively at Frank, I think Eveline is already over him. I don't think she ever let herself love him because she knew she could hurt herself. I also think that she has completely let go of him by the time he is on the ship calling to her. She knows she won't go. I think Eveline is a complex character. Joyce leaves little clues throughout the story to help the reader get to know Eveline. For example, he tells the reader that Frank loves Eveline but never Eveline loves Frank. That attention to detail changes Eveline's decision to not go at the end of the story.
Araby
This story is about a boy who doesn't fulfill his dream to buy the love of his life a gift from the bazaar.
1. Where does the boy live?
2. How is where the boy lives important?
3. Why do you think the boy doesn't buy anything in the end of the story?
The character of the boy is likeable because I think he's immature. Everyone is immature at one point or another. I think the reason the boy doesn't buy anything in the end is because he wants only the best for this. Because he is so late he'll have to settle on something sufficient, not perfect. I think the reader can guess and assume about the boy more than the boy tells you. I think the author did a good job of creating symbols within the story but made it too boring.
1. Where does the boy live?
2. How is where the boy lives important?
3. Why do you think the boy doesn't buy anything in the end of the story?
The character of the boy is likeable because I think he's immature. Everyone is immature at one point or another. I think the reason the boy doesn't buy anything in the end is because he wants only the best for this. Because he is so late he'll have to settle on something sufficient, not perfect. I think the reader can guess and assume about the boy more than the boy tells you. I think the author did a good job of creating symbols within the story but made it too boring.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
A Good Man Is Hard To Find
This story is about an old woman and her family's ride to florida and how they eventually die.
1. What is the daughter in the family's name?
2. Why did the author have Bailey wear a shirt with parrots on it?
3. Explain the misfit? What do you think he means?
Wow. This story was weird, creepy, complex, interesting, and many other adjectives. I'm still not sure as to whether or not i liked it. I don't think i truly understood most of it. I went to a parochial school all of my childhood and middle school years and I'm sure I didn't understand all those religious references. One thing i understood for the theme is no one is good or bad. The main character was even illustrated by the author as devious and deceptive in order to get her way. And her children were illustrated as ingrates. As to the misfit... I think the author tried to make him seem crazy but crazy from thinking too much. Which i think is possible, if you think to much and question everything about the WHYS of the world you'll drive yourself nuts.
1. What is the daughter in the family's name?
2. Why did the author have Bailey wear a shirt with parrots on it?
3. Explain the misfit? What do you think he means?
Wow. This story was weird, creepy, complex, interesting, and many other adjectives. I'm still not sure as to whether or not i liked it. I don't think i truly understood most of it. I went to a parochial school all of my childhood and middle school years and I'm sure I didn't understand all those religious references. One thing i understood for the theme is no one is good or bad. The main character was even illustrated by the author as devious and deceptive in order to get her way. And her children were illustrated as ingrates. As to the misfit... I think the author tried to make him seem crazy but crazy from thinking too much. Which i think is possible, if you think to much and question everything about the WHYS of the world you'll drive yourself nuts.
Monday, September 1, 2008
The Rocking-Horse Winner
The short story "The Rocking Horse Winner" is about a young man, Paul, trying to satisfy his mother and himself through attaining money but only succeeding in his death.
1. What was the name of the horse that won in Paul's final bet?
2. What did Paul's rocking on the horse symbolize?
3. Do you think you are like any character in this story?
D.H. Lawrence kept me completly enthralled throught out the entire story. The theme of this story is many people are careening down a path seeking higher status!, more wealth!, more!, more!, more! to a point where it literally kills them (Heath Ledger, Elvis Presley, Gatsby, etc.). The author illustrates Paul to be young and naive. I think he does this because many people don't realize they are seeking only material objects which will not give them happiness. Paul is definately a complex charecter with much of his prsonality left to the reader to decide. Does Paul 'succeed' in the end or fail? I think the mother is actually not all that complex. I think she's pretty one dimensional and the auther chose to basically make her the protagonist.
1. What was the name of the horse that won in Paul's final bet?
2. What did Paul's rocking on the horse symbolize?
3. Do you think you are like any character in this story?
D.H. Lawrence kept me completly enthralled throught out the entire story. The theme of this story is many people are careening down a path seeking higher status!, more wealth!, more!, more!, more! to a point where it literally kills them (Heath Ledger, Elvis Presley, Gatsby, etc.). The author illustrates Paul to be young and naive. I think he does this because many people don't realize they are seeking only material objects which will not give them happiness. Paul is definately a complex charecter with much of his prsonality left to the reader to decide. Does Paul 'succeed' in the end or fail? I think the mother is actually not all that complex. I think she's pretty one dimensional and the auther chose to basically make her the protagonist.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
I Stand Here Ironing
The story "I stand here ironing" is about a woman recollecting raising her first born child and her inability to properly care for her.
1. What is the daughter's name?
2. Why does the author end the story with the main character ironing?
3. Do you think you could forgive the mother in this story?
What would you do if you were the mother?
I really enjoyed this story. I thought it had depth and the author did a nice job of of creating a complex main character. I think the reader only knew as much as the narrator told you. i liked that the author used the ironing board to begin the story, kept it throughout, and used it for a conclusion. I think the theme of this story is complicated and has numerous aspects. The relationship between parents and children is actually quite fragile and difficult to nurture into a lasting healthy bond. Sometimes instances in childhood cannot be overcome affect the rest of our lives. i feel badly for the narrator because she did the best she could and it was far from enough for her child. I think the ending was somewhat ambiguous and its is left to the reader to discern the outcome of the mother and child's relationship.
1. What is the daughter's name?
2. Why does the author end the story with the main character ironing?
3. Do you think you could forgive the mother in this story?
What would you do if you were the mother?
I really enjoyed this story. I thought it had depth and the author did a nice job of of creating a complex main character. I think the reader only knew as much as the narrator told you. i liked that the author used the ironing board to begin the story, kept it throughout, and used it for a conclusion. I think the theme of this story is complicated and has numerous aspects. The relationship between parents and children is actually quite fragile and difficult to nurture into a lasting healthy bond. Sometimes instances in childhood cannot be overcome affect the rest of our lives. i feel badly for the narrator because she did the best she could and it was far from enough for her child. I think the ending was somewhat ambiguous and its is left to the reader to discern the outcome of the mother and child's relationship.
Sunday, August 24, 2008
"The Lesson"
Toni Cade Bambara's "The Lesson" illustrates for the reader a young girl's revelation about a country that cheats her yet publicizes its equality.
1. To what toy store did Miss Moore take the children?
2. Explain the internal conflict the narrator feels right before she enters the toy shop.
3. Do you think the author did a successful job in making an implicit argument within this story?
I did not like this story. I think it was cliche and much to transparent of a plotline. I think the author relied heavily on the narrator's dirty mouth to give the story credibility. I think the author tries to make a political argument within this story. I agree with the author's perspective but think she made a terrible job crafting this piece. Her emotional appeal in the story is good but too fake, too made for TV movie. When I read this I didn't think that i wanted to meet the main character. I thought that she sounded like a fictional character. The opening of the story is quite good and caught my attention. I did not enjoy he rest all that much.
1. To what toy store did Miss Moore take the children?
2. Explain the internal conflict the narrator feels right before she enters the toy shop.
3. Do you think the author did a successful job in making an implicit argument within this story?
I did not like this story. I think it was cliche and much to transparent of a plotline. I think the author relied heavily on the narrator's dirty mouth to give the story credibility. I think the author tries to make a political argument within this story. I agree with the author's perspective but think she made a terrible job crafting this piece. Her emotional appeal in the story is good but too fake, too made for TV movie. When I read this I didn't think that i wanted to meet the main character. I thought that she sounded like a fictional character. The opening of the story is quite good and caught my attention. I did not enjoy he rest all that much.
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Joe realizes what he wants
At the end of the novel Joe realizes that we must turn our guns on the people (government) that tells us to shoot to kill. This is a surprising ending because the entire book seems to implicitly make the argument that war must end. I personally think the book should be about peace. However if the book were about peace it would be futile. We could never achieve peace because we are a corrupt people. I also don’t think American people will ever revolt against the government for telling them to go to war. Although Joe is pointing the gun at the end of the book for peace, I don’t think this is a good strategy for it. I do think Trumbo’s impassioned book was beautifully written and probably and eye opener to many. His resolution to the book was amazing even if I don’t agree with his concept.
Joe's Desires
Joe desires human connection throughout most of the second half of the novel. By the end he wants to communicate to the world the horrors and realities of war. I agree with Joe’s desire for human connection. Even if I were not in Joe’s condition I would want human connection. Loneliness is such a simple feeling and yet I believe few have truly felt it. To feel alone in this world, to feel as though no one love you completely or wholly is depressing and scary. All I would want is human connection if I were in Joe’s situation. But at the end of the novel Joe want a voice in America. This is valiant but unrealistic. Joe wants to be brave and become the hero. But if I were in his situation (realistically thinking) I would want to be killed. I would no longer want to live and I wouldn’t care about the rest humanity. I also would probably blame them for my situation.
Friday, May 9, 2008
Against Regulations
Joe wants the human race to understand war in all its realities and consequences. Joe’s been dead. He’s seen war. And Its. Not. Worth. It. Joe has seen rats eating human faces. Joe has seen mothers crying for their little boys. Joe has heard the screams of soldiers dying. Joe has been blown to nothing. Joe knows war. People that promote and support war don’t understand it completely because they’ve never been to war. Joe wants people to understand the horror and damage war causes so that they think before they advocate going to war. Joe wants the government to be truthful and not put war in a respectful light for people. This is against regulations because if people knew the truth no one would be duped into going to war. The government wants people to be ignorant. It is much easier to sway an ignorant society than one that knows all the facts.
Joe's Injury
Joe Bonham has lost his legs, his arms, and his entire face. Essentially Joe has lost all senses besides touch. Somehow, Joe has for the most part remained sane and eventually Joe makes a goal for himself: to know the time. The fact that Joe makes a goal for himself is essential in understanding the book. Joe has only himself and his mind. To make a goal for himself and attempt to live means Joe hasn’t given up or gone insane. Joe’s ‘injury’ also deduces him to dead another important theme in the book. Because Joe is the closest to death a person can come Trumbo creates Joe’s credibility. Joe has been dead and going to war isn’t worth it.
Thursday, April 24, 2008
In the article “What is Marriage?” by Evan Wolfson, Wolfson essentially compares marriage between a gay couple and convicted felons. Wolfson does this because he is making the point that prisoners have the right to get married but a homosexual couple does not. By putting homosexuals in the same category as prisoners Wolfson is forcing his readers to consider the extremity of banning gay marriage. I thought this was an incredibly effective rhetorical strategy because it shows the fault of our system so prevalently. It cannot get much clearer than prisoners can marry but gay people cannot. I think this example of how far our government has gone to keep gay marriage illegal is relevant because it shows a great comparison of how skewed our government is.
Gender Betrayal
Vazquez waits to disclose the fact that Mickey and Brian are heterosexual to make a rhetorical argument. Vazquez waits because as you are reading it is easy to write the story off as ‘another’ story of homophobic violence but because she almost tricks the reader Vazquez makes a stronger appeal to our emotions. If they were gay, then the situation couldn’t happen to ‘me’ or ‘you’, but since they are straight the story has an ‘it could happen to you tone. I do not believe the issue of antigay violence changes in any way when we recognize that sometimes its victims are heterosexual because they were still perceived as gay thus the violence is still homophobic. I think our argument in class focused on what was homophobic and what wasn’t but I understood Vazquez’s argument to have a different meaning. I think Vazquez’s most important point is that in American culture we are not allowed to stray from our respective genders. Whether you are gay, straight, or bi you are not accepted if you dress outside of what your gender is ‘supposed’ to wear. My stepmom wears skirts when she is in the courtroom even though I know she prefers to wear pants. Why wear a skirt? Because in central Indiana you are more likely to appeal to a male judge if you dress in a more matronly/womanly fashion.
This is how you...
This is how you love; this is how you yell; this is how you hit; this is how you fight. This is how you cook; this is what I like and I don’t care what you like; this is called leftovers. This is called having no money and this is how it will work; this is not enough food; this is not enough money for new shoes; this is me trying. This is not enough time for me to parent you; this is I’M WORKING; this is me getting up from my desk to teach you how ride a bike; this is the moment where your dad pulls up because it’s his time for visitation; this is fake. This is what you wear when you get a job. This is how you treat your friends. This is how you shmooze. This is how you shut out the world; this is blasting music in the house and the car and any chance I get. This is a hug because you are sick; this is real. This is lying; this is lying to yourself. This is home; that’s not home. This is happy; this is hate; this is anger; this is self-loathing; this is pain. This is how you love.
Monday, April 14, 2008
Why is Eustace Conway the Last American Man?
Elizabeth Gilbert makes the assertion that Eustace Conway is the last American man in her book “The Last American Man”. Gilbert has interviewed almost every person Eustace has ever known and spent a great deal of time with Eustace. She has worked by his side, elbow deep in dirt, never receiving a break. She has had long talks with him about his family, lovers, and friends. She has even gotten drunk with Eustace. She knows him better then he probably knows himself. After all this quality (and quantity) time spent with Eustace she can probably make the assertion that Eustace is the last American man with self confidence. But before I would begin to explain why Gilbert is correct in her assertion I must define what she means by ‘the last American man’.
In the early days of America, the land was nothing but flora and fauna. The earliest settlers could do with it what they wished all they had to do was step upon the ground and claim it as their own. These people had vision, drive, and heart to reach their goals. They must prepare for every possible outcome because whatever it could be it may be their last. In a simple term, the earliest peoples of the world lived ‘awake’. They must be ‘awake’ to predators at all times to protect themselves and their food. They must be ‘awake’ to the weather at all times to protect themselves and their shelter and clothing. They must be ‘awake’ to other peoples because who knows when another tribe or ‘white man’ could attack. The people of today live exactly in the opposite manner.
The people of today live in a ‘sleep’, or better described as ‘stupor’. We are intoxicated by drugs, alcohol and sex; the behavior commonly publicized. We don’t have to worry about the weather because with today’s technology the weather can easily be avoided. We don’t have to worry about predatory animals because we’ve killed plenty of them and they don’t normally migrate toward cities or towns. We don’t need to depend on ourselves because society cares for us. We are coddled and brainwashed through the education system, no expectation to think for ourselves. Most of us don’t think because we don’t have to. But this is not the way Eustace Conway lives.
Eustace fights animals with his bare hands. If he loses… He eats what the earth gives him and what he can hunt on his own. He lives in whatever he can build for himself. Eustace works hard both physically and mentally for everything he attains in life. Eustace is quite literally ‘the last American man.’
In the early days of America, the land was nothing but flora and fauna. The earliest settlers could do with it what they wished all they had to do was step upon the ground and claim it as their own. These people had vision, drive, and heart to reach their goals. They must prepare for every possible outcome because whatever it could be it may be their last. In a simple term, the earliest peoples of the world lived ‘awake’. They must be ‘awake’ to predators at all times to protect themselves and their food. They must be ‘awake’ to the weather at all times to protect themselves and their shelter and clothing. They must be ‘awake’ to other peoples because who knows when another tribe or ‘white man’ could attack. The people of today live exactly in the opposite manner.
The people of today live in a ‘sleep’, or better described as ‘stupor’. We are intoxicated by drugs, alcohol and sex; the behavior commonly publicized. We don’t have to worry about the weather because with today’s technology the weather can easily be avoided. We don’t have to worry about predatory animals because we’ve killed plenty of them and they don’t normally migrate toward cities or towns. We don’t need to depend on ourselves because society cares for us. We are coddled and brainwashed through the education system, no expectation to think for ourselves. Most of us don’t think because we don’t have to. But this is not the way Eustace Conway lives.
Eustace fights animals with his bare hands. If he loses… He eats what the earth gives him and what he can hunt on his own. He lives in whatever he can build for himself. Eustace works hard both physically and mentally for everything he attains in life. Eustace is quite literally ‘the last American man.’
Friday, April 4, 2008
Alexis de Tocqueville
Alexis de Tocqueville writes an interesting article about the differences between american women and european women. He explains that democracy creates a natural division between the sexes in America, that men must do the hard labor while women sit at home and run the household. He argues that this is what is natural and and what the sexes are meat to do. He believes our 'set paths' are what make America flourish. He acknowledges that women are respected and can be successful in america...but only in the designated field. He then describes European men and women, exaplaining a womans 'honor' in europe. Tocquville speaks european men and women being alike, holding the same job titles and rights. He explains that this has changed european women toward being less honorable. He believes european women less respected in regards to their sexuality. Tocqueville is a dip.
Disney Women
As a little kid I was always a fan of Disney fairy tales. I remember seeing Beauty and the Beast with my dad in theatres. I remember watching Cinderella with my aunt and family before dinner. I remember almost all the movies, especially Snow White. I remembered snow white for her beautiful black hair, fair skin, and heart of gold. I can remember all the odd little dwarves but not their names. I also remember the beautiful evil stepmother and role as snow whites horrible nemesis. I can remember all these things and it is not until now that I can fully understand how deep every character’s meaning.
Two women are featured in this movie and three have roles. Snow White’s biological mother is dead, rendering her powerless. Snow White must be the dumbest girl I have ever been forced to watch star in a movie. The dwarves tried to tell her not to listen or take anything from strangers and not only does she ignore their warning, SHE TAKES FOOD. And of course this leads me to her Evil stepmother. The one women with power in he story and she uses it for evil. I find it interesting Disney chose to make a woman, particularly a stepmother, the nemesis in most of their movies. What does all this teach our children? That most women with power, a queen, will use it for harm? To be good they must be beautiful and stupid? And if they do mess up, eventually their prince will come along and clean up their mess? Mulan was past my generation and at the moment I cant think of another Disney movie with a powerful women taking the lead role. What was I taught?
Two women are featured in this movie and three have roles. Snow White’s biological mother is dead, rendering her powerless. Snow White must be the dumbest girl I have ever been forced to watch star in a movie. The dwarves tried to tell her not to listen or take anything from strangers and not only does she ignore their warning, SHE TAKES FOOD. And of course this leads me to her Evil stepmother. The one women with power in he story and she uses it for evil. I find it interesting Disney chose to make a woman, particularly a stepmother, the nemesis in most of their movies. What does all this teach our children? That most women with power, a queen, will use it for harm? To be good they must be beautiful and stupid? And if they do mess up, eventually their prince will come along and clean up their mess? Mulan was past my generation and at the moment I cant think of another Disney movie with a powerful women taking the lead role. What was I taught?
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Emerson's Nature
“Nature is a setting that fits equally well a comic or a mourning piece. In good health, the air is a cordial of incredible virtue. Crossing a bare common, in snow puddles, at twilight, under a clouded sky, without having in my thoughts any occurrence of special good fortune, I have enjoyed a perfect exhilaration.I am glad to the brink of fear.”
The ideas Emerson alludes to in the first chapter of Nature are ideas I am well acquainted with. I read Walden last year and have studied the concept of transcendentalism. My favorite excerpt from Emerson’s first chapter is around the end of the chapter. Emerson talks about nature’s impact on our moods. He explains that nature can make us both happy and sad in an instant. This idea especially speaks to me because sometimes I can be feeling fine and content then I step outside to a beautiful day and I feel euphoric. Simply the smell and view of nature can bring me great happiness and joy. This can also happen in dismal surroundings as Emerson explains. Nature’s affect is unexpected and involuntary. I would even take this concept further and connect it to music. One song can change your life. You can be in a terrible mood and suddenly hear a “poppin” song and feel a sudden burst of happiness. A song, like nature, can evoke many emotions in a person.
The ideas Emerson alludes to in the first chapter of Nature are ideas I am well acquainted with. I read Walden last year and have studied the concept of transcendentalism. My favorite excerpt from Emerson’s first chapter is around the end of the chapter. Emerson talks about nature’s impact on our moods. He explains that nature can make us both happy and sad in an instant. This idea especially speaks to me because sometimes I can be feeling fine and content then I step outside to a beautiful day and I feel euphoric. Simply the smell and view of nature can bring me great happiness and joy. This can also happen in dismal surroundings as Emerson explains. Nature’s affect is unexpected and involuntary. I would even take this concept further and connect it to music. One song can change your life. You can be in a terrible mood and suddenly hear a “poppin” song and feel a sudden burst of happiness. A song, like nature, can evoke many emotions in a person.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Wright's Realization
At the end of the book “Black Boy” Richard Wright comes to a conclusion. Wright realizes America still has a long way to go before equality rings true. Wright says, “It’s going to take a long and bloody time, a lot of stumbling and a lot of falling, before they find the right road. …Until they learn how to live.”p 382. Throughout the entire book Wright is looking for the meaning behind meaningless suffering and how to put a stop to it. By the end of the book Wright has taken on a more resigned and dejected tone. He will continue to try to educate the minority and fight for what he believes is right. His only hope: an answer. I find the ending hopeful yet harshly real at the same time. I agree with Wright, all one can do is not give up and eventually wait for the change that is needed. Wright says he hopes to keep alive in our hearts a sense of the inexpressibly human. I think most people do not realize this quality exists, none the less within them. Wright’s fight is one I wish we all realized we must participate in. Everyone is equal. Everyone deserves equal opportunity for success in life. Unfortunately that is not The United State’s law or government. In response we as a country must not give up our fight for liberty and the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Politicians vs. Artists
Wright states that the artist and the politician stand at opposite ends of the poles in chapter 19. Half of Wright’s reason for this assertion is artists must be emotional and then publicize their emotion. Politicians must be impersonal and logical in life. Both are working for the betterment of mankind and end up struggling over how much help they offer the world. The artist can offer suggestions or other aspects for doing things while the politician sneers at this meager contribution. I happen to agree with Wright. I believe politicians only look at the facts of a country, trying to serve a majority. I believe the artist looks for any and all suffering and tries to embody this suffering in their work. Both occupations influence the other but both worlds never seem to collide.
Art Influence
http://artbozeman.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/kevinconolly-mangirlandboy-clujnapocaromania.jpg
I was about to start a tedious expedition in search of the perfect picture when I was pleasantly surprised. I opened my internet explorer page to my yahoo home page and found the opening news story to be directly related to art.
Kevin Connolly was born with no legs. Rather than succumb to depression and personal defeat, Kevin Connolly chooses to live an exceptional life. He holds an Olympic medal and has traveled through Europe and Asia, feats most Americans have not accomplished. While in Europe, Connolly took a picture of a man he knew was staring at him. This picture eventually evolved into 32,000 photographs of curious onlookers to Connolly’s circumstance.
Connolly says he takes the pictures because when people are looking at him with pity or curiosity or disgust it opens them up. One can see into these people, into their souls. Connolly also he likes to make sure he is not looking at them when he snaps the shot because you get a personal and emotional shot of them.
Connolly’s story completely captured me. (side note: I found it serendipitous that I would find this news article before I even started looking for pictures.) I went though numerous photographs trying to find one that I personally connected with. I decided on a photograph of a little boy and girl and their father. I chose this photo because there is something about the boy’s eyes and demeanor. His upper body is pulling away from the camera and Connolly. Is this out of disgust or fear of what is different? His eyes are drawn which gives him a look of disgust. I doubt the boy actually feels disgust toward Connolly so what are the boy’s eyes saying? I see sadness and shock, a bit of both. I think it is interesting the boy pays complete attention to Connolly while his father and sister seem to be engrossed in other thoughts. His sister is looking through Connolly; slight curiosity shown in her face. His father is not even paying Connolly attention.
I think what is shown in the photographs is important but I think the what is an even greater question. Why do people, such as myself, make such looks toward people that are different? Obviously we are surprised and shocked by what we do not know. I also think we don’t want to understand what we don’t know. I think it’s easier to not try to understand some one else’s pain because that requires letting your guard down and thinking. People don’t want to accept that someone else is in real pain because that would be accepting there is a problem in the world. Accepting there is a problem in the world means a change must be made and that requires work and people don’t want to work.
I was about to start a tedious expedition in search of the perfect picture when I was pleasantly surprised. I opened my internet explorer page to my yahoo home page and found the opening news story to be directly related to art.
Kevin Connolly was born with no legs. Rather than succumb to depression and personal defeat, Kevin Connolly chooses to live an exceptional life. He holds an Olympic medal and has traveled through Europe and Asia, feats most Americans have not accomplished. While in Europe, Connolly took a picture of a man he knew was staring at him. This picture eventually evolved into 32,000 photographs of curious onlookers to Connolly’s circumstance.
Connolly says he takes the pictures because when people are looking at him with pity or curiosity or disgust it opens them up. One can see into these people, into their souls. Connolly also he likes to make sure he is not looking at them when he snaps the shot because you get a personal and emotional shot of them.
Connolly’s story completely captured me. (side note: I found it serendipitous that I would find this news article before I even started looking for pictures.) I went though numerous photographs trying to find one that I personally connected with. I decided on a photograph of a little boy and girl and their father. I chose this photo because there is something about the boy’s eyes and demeanor. His upper body is pulling away from the camera and Connolly. Is this out of disgust or fear of what is different? His eyes are drawn which gives him a look of disgust. I doubt the boy actually feels disgust toward Connolly so what are the boy’s eyes saying? I see sadness and shock, a bit of both. I think it is interesting the boy pays complete attention to Connolly while his father and sister seem to be engrossed in other thoughts. His sister is looking through Connolly; slight curiosity shown in her face. His father is not even paying Connolly attention.
I think what is shown in the photographs is important but I think the what is an even greater question. Why do people, such as myself, make such looks toward people that are different? Obviously we are surprised and shocked by what we do not know. I also think we don’t want to understand what we don’t know. I think it’s easier to not try to understand some one else’s pain because that requires letting your guard down and thinking. People don’t want to accept that someone else is in real pain because that would be accepting there is a problem in the world. Accepting there is a problem in the world means a change must be made and that requires work and people don’t want to work.
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Parenthetical Passages
Wright has grappled with American ideas throughout the entire first half of his book, Black Boy. He has tried to understand how to live in a white man’s world, how even an established black man is controlled by the white men, and searched for truth in damaged world. By chapter 15 Richard seems to answer his questions more, especially through parenthetical passages. A large part of this chapter is dedicated to Wright describing the women he works with and their goals and views on life. Wright speaks of these goals and dreams then comments on them through a parenthetical passage.
The women Wright works with think only surface thoughts and hope for only simple things. Wright is puzzled by these women’s thoughts and comes to a conclusion. Wright says, “They knew nothing of hate and fear, and strove instinctively to avoid all passion.” What Wright means is they had never lived a life like his, a life that involved survival and intelligence. If you have never been forced to survive and stare gritty life in the face you cannot fathom passion. Wright continues to brew over this thought.
Wright then comes to the conclusion this is the way most people live. Wright says, “The essence of irony of the plight of the negro in America, to me, is that he is doomed to live in isolation while those who condemn him seek the basest goals of any people on the face of the earth.” Wright believes he is oppressed by a culture in which the people have no thoughts of importance or goals of worth. Wright thinks that if his sufferings were for the greater good, “some remote, high, sacrificial end”, he could be reconciled with the white man. But Wright knows they look outwardly, seeking only material objects. I believe this still goes on today.
We endorse only buying “American-made” goods. We push to get illegal immigrants out of this country. Do people not understand America can not flourish alone? Do people not understand the backbone of America is immigrants working the minimum wage jobs we are unwilling to do?
The women Wright works with think only surface thoughts and hope for only simple things. Wright is puzzled by these women’s thoughts and comes to a conclusion. Wright says, “They knew nothing of hate and fear, and strove instinctively to avoid all passion.” What Wright means is they had never lived a life like his, a life that involved survival and intelligence. If you have never been forced to survive and stare gritty life in the face you cannot fathom passion. Wright continues to brew over this thought.
Wright then comes to the conclusion this is the way most people live. Wright says, “The essence of irony of the plight of the negro in America, to me, is that he is doomed to live in isolation while those who condemn him seek the basest goals of any people on the face of the earth.” Wright believes he is oppressed by a culture in which the people have no thoughts of importance or goals of worth. Wright thinks that if his sufferings were for the greater good, “some remote, high, sacrificial end”, he could be reconciled with the white man. But Wright knows they look outwardly, seeking only material objects. I believe this still goes on today.
We endorse only buying “American-made” goods. We push to get illegal immigrants out of this country. Do people not understand America can not flourish alone? Do people not understand the backbone of America is immigrants working the minimum wage jobs we are unwilling to do?
Sunday, March 9, 2008
End of Part Deux (isn't that 2 in french?)
At the end of part I Wright decides to move north with Aunt Maggie and his brother and mother. I may have misunderstood the prompt, but I believe this change to be a positive one. Wright was walking down a dangerous road in the South and he was walking closer and closer to getting himself killed. Moving North was safer because in the north he is unnoticed and lost in the gulf of people. The problem with Wrights move north is I think he believes it’s the answer to his problems. Moving north is definitely advantageous to his life but it will not end his trials and tribulations. Even in the north Racism runs deep, a lesson learned when Wright was selling KKK papers. I would like to think Wright’s life gets much easier in Part 2 but from the first half of the book I’ll bet not.
Subservience
Everyone is subservient to someone. I am subservient to almost every adult. The adults are subservient to their bosses and their boss’s bosses. I wish the United States could be a utopian society where everyone worked for the good of the people and there was no class system but that cannot happen. Because humanity is corrupt and it is human nature to seek only personal gain, subservience is necessary in order to live in a harmonious atmosphere. There will always be some race seeking to be the elite. Will it change from Anglo-Saxon to African American or Latin somewhere along the line? I don’t know. I doubt it will change within the next couple hundred years because the minority races of this country have been oppressed for so long. I think subservience is necessary for the education system. Children need to understand they are not in charge and they need to obey their elders. This subservience should be limited and used only with positive reinforcement but is still necessary. Within the adult working environment I don’t know if subservience is necessary. Because the United States is capitalist, someone must always be submissive in the grand scheme of things. In small groups or communities I believe subservience can be eliminated because behavior can be modeled and controlled by the community.
Learn How to Live in the South
In chapter 9 Wright is told to “learn how to live in the south” by his buddy Griggs. What Griggs means is Richard doesn’t even take notice ‘white’ people. To him, they are just people. This is a problem because white people want him to take notice of them, to look submissive when they walk past, to look fearful when they speak to him. Richard simply ignores white people, doesn’t pay them much attention and balks when they do something inappropriate or crude. Griggs tells Richard this because he wants Richard to understand how serious his attitude is. Richard could get killed simply because of his demeanor. If Richard learned how to live in the south he would need to cast his downward in the presence of a white man. Ignore their treatment of black women. Let them practically own him and physically hurt him. Richard knows he cannot give to this treatment so he must move northward in hopes it is better there.
Too Controversial?
What makes Richard a great man and lead character in “Black Boy” is his will. Richard fights for what he believes in, usually causing him to risk his life. Part of Richard’s goal in this book is to receive a good enough education to make a decent amount of money. Money gives you power and freedom, an unfortunate fact of life. The more power and freedom he has the more effective he can be when trying to make a change. Wright’s need to receive a higher education and his challenge of the Southern way of life puts him in a compromising position in chapter eight.
In chapter eight Wright is elected valedictorian of his class and is asked to write a speech for graduation day. Later Wright’s principal asks Wright to read a speech already written. Wright refuses, indignant that his principal would even ask. Wright realizes his principal is just as stuck as he in the south. His job is in jeopardy if Richard doesn’t read the prewritten speech. “I was talking to a “bought” man and he was trying to ‘buy” me.” says Wright.
Richard is justified in refusing to read the speech. If everyone gave in and said, “Welp, that’s just they way things work and there is nothing we can do about it” (cough* objectification of women in the media cough* cough*) there would never be a change in our world. Richard’s goal has always been never to give in, to fight for what he believes is right or wrong. If everyone turned on their brain and woke up to the world around them maybe good ol’ gee-dubya wouldn’t be in office. oops
In chapter eight Wright is elected valedictorian of his class and is asked to write a speech for graduation day. Later Wright’s principal asks Wright to read a speech already written. Wright refuses, indignant that his principal would even ask. Wright realizes his principal is just as stuck as he in the south. His job is in jeopardy if Richard doesn’t read the prewritten speech. “I was talking to a “bought” man and he was trying to ‘buy” me.” says Wright.
Richard is justified in refusing to read the speech. If everyone gave in and said, “Welp, that’s just they way things work and there is nothing we can do about it” (cough* objectification of women in the media cough* cough*) there would never be a change in our world. Richard’s goal has always been never to give in, to fight for what he believes is right or wrong. If everyone turned on their brain and woke up to the world around them maybe good ol’ gee-dubya wouldn’t be in office. oops
The Uncle Tom fiasco is less important than the Church disaster
Wright cannot seem to catch a break. In the beginning of chapter six Wright obtains a job from a stupid white woman. She asks him if he steal expecting an honest answer and offers him rotten food. Wright quits the job and eventually gets into a fight with Uncle Tom about discipline. Wright doesn’t know Uncle Tom and Uncle Tom doesn’t know him. Uncle Tom has no right to discipline Wright. Prior to the Uncle Tom scuffle though Wright is literally tricked into getting baptized by the church preacher. I think this was a much more interesting situation in chapter six rather than why Wright is angry with Uncle Tom.
At this point in the book Wright is in school and has made some ‘friends’. He is not close with his classmates yet he longs to be among them. Wright decides to go to the Methodist church with his mother in order to assimilate. While in church one day the pastor asks all nonmembers to stand. Then the pastor asks all these ‘sinners’ to go to the front and sit in the first pew. Both of these actions were done in order to isolate Wright from the rest of the ‘flock’ and to guilt the young men. Most of these young men were with their mothers or relatives. Then to ensure the young men felt the shame, the preacher asks the congregation to pray for these lost souls. THEN the preacher asks the mothers to come and KNEEL DOWN in front of the outcasts and pray for them. The preacher is using an obscure psychological tactic on the adolescents. The preacher is using a primal human instinct against these boys. Since the beginning of time human have wanted to belong, to fit in with a group. It is instinct to move in groups or flocks and live in communities with one another. The preacher is separating the young man from his tribe. In order to belong the nonmember must join the congregation. Then the preacher uses the primal connection one has with their mother. He calls the mother to the front and gives a sermon about all they have done for their children. Then the preacher uses pride, one last primal instinct.
Wright knows the preacher is trying to humiliate and guilt him yet he is trapped. He will hurt himself if he does not join the church and he will hurt his mother. But if he joins, Wright is giving in to what he has fought since the beginning of his life. If Wright believes something is wrong he fights it or stands up to it. Wright is in a position that follows the theme of the whole book. Wright is wrong if he submits and wrong if he challenges.
At this point in the book Wright is in school and has made some ‘friends’. He is not close with his classmates yet he longs to be among them. Wright decides to go to the Methodist church with his mother in order to assimilate. While in church one day the pastor asks all nonmembers to stand. Then the pastor asks all these ‘sinners’ to go to the front and sit in the first pew. Both of these actions were done in order to isolate Wright from the rest of the ‘flock’ and to guilt the young men. Most of these young men were with their mothers or relatives. Then to ensure the young men felt the shame, the preacher asks the congregation to pray for these lost souls. THEN the preacher asks the mothers to come and KNEEL DOWN in front of the outcasts and pray for them. The preacher is using an obscure psychological tactic on the adolescents. The preacher is using a primal human instinct against these boys. Since the beginning of time human have wanted to belong, to fit in with a group. It is instinct to move in groups or flocks and live in communities with one another. The preacher is separating the young man from his tribe. In order to belong the nonmember must join the congregation. Then the preacher uses the primal connection one has with their mother. He calls the mother to the front and gives a sermon about all they have done for their children. Then the preacher uses pride, one last primal instinct.
Wright knows the preacher is trying to humiliate and guilt him yet he is trapped. He will hurt himself if he does not join the church and he will hurt his mother. But if he joins, Wright is giving in to what he has fought since the beginning of his life. If Wright believes something is wrong he fights it or stands up to it. Wright is in a position that follows the theme of the whole book. Wright is wrong if he submits and wrong if he challenges.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Gratification
Richard Wright creates the short story about an Indian girl for numerous reasons. Wright lives in a bleak, hopeless world. In an attempt to escape that world Wright writes a short ‘story’ about an Indian girl with no plot or action. Wright then shares his story with a young lady that lives down the street from him. The girl doesn’t understand the story and doesn’t understand why Wright would ever write it. I believe this is why Wright is gratified in writing it.
The girl did not need to understand the story or even praise it. Wright feels his gratification when the woman questions him why he would write it. This is Wright’s justification in his superiority over the woman. Subconsciously Wright knows writing this story is intelligent and an emotional release. He knows he has transcended himself beyond this woman simply in imagining the premise of the story. He stepped into a world this woman could never begin to comprehend. He enjoys her look of confusion and bewilderment because he knows he is beyond her on so many levels. He understands and imagines worlds this woman can’t even comprehend and Wright therefore can move beyond this woman’s intelligence.
The girl did not need to understand the story or even praise it. Wright feels his gratification when the woman questions him why he would write it. This is Wright’s justification in his superiority over the woman. Subconsciously Wright knows writing this story is intelligent and an emotional release. He knows he has transcended himself beyond this woman simply in imagining the premise of the story. He stepped into a world this woman could never begin to comprehend. He enjoys her look of confusion and bewilderment because he knows he is beyond her on so many levels. He understands and imagines worlds this woman can’t even comprehend and Wright therefore can move beyond this woman’s intelligence.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
How does wright deal with his mother's paralysis?
Wright deals with his mother’s paralysis the same way he deals with life; he adapts. Wright has shown many times throughout his book his ability to survive. He is hungry, he waits. He wants answers, he asks. He is bored, he finds something to do. These three sound like simple obstacles to overcome but in reality Wright went hungry, uneducated, and was left to raise himself for most of his life. His most defining moment though, is when his mother becomes paralyzed. Wright writes to his grandmother asked for help. Then he gets numerous jobs to support himself and put food into his hands. Wright does not break, he continues through life. I think Wright’s attitude toward life is not shared by most.
I think most people will not be able to appreciate all of Wright’s accomplishments because they have never had to endure anything. I have no clue what it I like to watch your own mother die in bed before you are a teenager. I have no clue what it is like to be so helpless that you must get a job in order to feed yourself. I do know I can read this book with an open mind and try to understand all that Wright has gone through. I think that is important in this class. I think we need to listen with open minds and not shut a personal story because one believes they have heard it before. We learn from other people, from sharing ideas and personal experiences. To automatically assume a stance and assume and argument forces you to turn off your brain to all ideas.
I think most people will not be able to appreciate all of Wright’s accomplishments because they have never had to endure anything. I have no clue what it I like to watch your own mother die in bed before you are a teenager. I have no clue what it is like to be so helpless that you must get a job in order to feed yourself. I do know I can read this book with an open mind and try to understand all that Wright has gone through. I think that is important in this class. I think we need to listen with open minds and not shut a personal story because one believes they have heard it before. We learn from other people, from sharing ideas and personal experiences. To automatically assume a stance and assume and argument forces you to turn off your brain to all ideas.
What factors play in to Wright's cultrural heritage
Wright taunts and mocks the Jews living in his community along with numerous other black children. Wright calls them “Christ killers” and sings cruel songs about them. Wright justifies his actions through his “cultural heritage”. By ‘cultural heritage’ Wright means the experiences and interactions he had with the people around him, especially the adults.
Wright has known racism his whole life. He notices his mother cooking for white people but he has no food. He hears the news of a ‘white’ man beating a ‘black’ boy. He realizes that it doesn’t matter the color of your skin; if you have any African-American relative, you are black. Wright is beginning to grapple with the knowledge of racism. He is trying to understand it and yet fit into his own culture at the same time. But Wright is realizing his culture is racist as well. As he grows up he learns that he and the white boys are filling their racial roles “as though they were being guided by instinct”. Wright doesn’t flat out say in his book that he knew his racist actions were wrong, but rather illustrates for the reader his lack of understanding at what he was doing.
Wright has known racism his whole life. He notices his mother cooking for white people but he has no food. He hears the news of a ‘white’ man beating a ‘black’ boy. He realizes that it doesn’t matter the color of your skin; if you have any African-American relative, you are black. Wright is beginning to grapple with the knowledge of racism. He is trying to understand it and yet fit into his own culture at the same time. But Wright is realizing his culture is racist as well. As he grows up he learns that he and the white boys are filling their racial roles “as though they were being guided by instinct”. Wright doesn’t flat out say in his book that he knew his racist actions were wrong, but rather illustrates for the reader his lack of understanding at what he was doing.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Why is Wright Really Hungry? (I don't really know)
Richard Wright is physically hungry because no adult in his life will give him food. Obviously. Wright’s hunger is more than just something physical though. Wright’s hunger is fueled by his anger and confusion at why he can’t eat, one of life’s three basic necessities for survival (food, shelter, clothing). He sees his preacher eating fried chicken right in front of him, yet Wright cannot eat it too. He sees a white family eating an abundance of food, yet Wright is given only their scraps. He sees his father living comfortably with his concubine, yet will give Wright no money for food. Wright expresses his indignation and confusion in this passage. “Watching the white people eat would make my empty stomach churn and I would grow vaguely angry. Why could I not eat when I was hungry? Why did I always have to wait until others were through? I could not understand why some people had enough food and others did not.” (P 19). It is not the hunger that he feels burdened by but his anger over it. When his mother begs him to go ask his father for money for food, Wright refuses. If Wright were simply physically hungry he would go to his father for food. Wright refuses though out of principle.
No More School
John Taylor Gatto writes an impassioned article questioning the need for schools in America. He quotes H.L. Mencken, alludes to the Prussian education system, and sections the six areas Ingle’s writes about in the Principles of Secondary Education. Gatto’s article was well researched and definitely appealing to a high school student such as myself. However, I don’t completely agree with Gatto in his belief that The United States should completely eliminate the public education system.
I have attended a public high school for two years and worked at a public elementary school. I am in complete agreement with Gatto in his argument that there needs to be a change. I believe we need to change the curriculum, change teacher’s wages, change what is being taught, change everything. I do not believe we should completely eradicate schools. When Gatto references the six steps created by Ingles, examples of every step popped into my head. The function I found most interesting was the selective function. This function covers the education system’s ability to catalogue certain children. This happens in both extracurricular and academic circumstances, in elementary and high school levels. In elementary schools the ‘gifted’ students’ desks were put into a pod separate from the rest of the class. The ‘disruptive’ students’ desks were pushed literally to the outskirts of the classroom, completely isolated from every other students. Every single one of these children had a D in math. High schools allow a group of students to make up special courts at dances to set apart only the most popular students. These are only a few examples to just one of the six functions the Gatto refers to in his article. Does this mean I there should be no more organized education. I personally feel that in more primal times a lot more would get done if everyone were left to their own selfmanagement. But this is an era where many mathematical, scientific, and artistic advances have been made. I believe there is so much information to be taught to future generations, there must be some form of organized education.
I have attended a public high school for two years and worked at a public elementary school. I am in complete agreement with Gatto in his argument that there needs to be a change. I believe we need to change the curriculum, change teacher’s wages, change what is being taught, change everything. I do not believe we should completely eradicate schools. When Gatto references the six steps created by Ingles, examples of every step popped into my head. The function I found most interesting was the selective function. This function covers the education system’s ability to catalogue certain children. This happens in both extracurricular and academic circumstances, in elementary and high school levels. In elementary schools the ‘gifted’ students’ desks were put into a pod separate from the rest of the class. The ‘disruptive’ students’ desks were pushed literally to the outskirts of the classroom, completely isolated from every other students. Every single one of these children had a D in math. High schools allow a group of students to make up special courts at dances to set apart only the most popular students. These are only a few examples to just one of the six functions the Gatto refers to in his article. Does this mean I there should be no more organized education. I personally feel that in more primal times a lot more would get done if everyone were left to their own selfmanagement. But this is an era where many mathematical, scientific, and artistic advances have been made. I believe there is so much information to be taught to future generations, there must be some form of organized education.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Do I Value My Nonacademic Education?
I value my nonacademic education, a privilege most do not have. I wake up every morning excited to go to school. We argue, explain, challenge, question, and examine many different ideas. University offers many classes and activities that that guarantee an education on the skills needed in life. From intellectual to moral education, University covers the broad spectrum needed to shape the pliable mind of young individuals.
From a student’s perspective, University maintains many goals. These goals fall especially into of Horace Mann’s categories of intellectual and moral education. University upholds 6 core values, one of these being mutual respect. Respect for your elders, peers, and inferiors is a value impressed upon all community members in University. Respect creates a trusting environment within University. There are no locks on the lockers and no one even uses a locker during an organized sport practice. The students are trusted to respect each other and their peer’s property. They are given respect by their superiors, the teachers.
Part of what makes University so challenging is the expected student responsibility. Students must make it to class on time, no bells for reminding. Students must find their daily homework assignments. And the teachers at University high school trust their students to do their homework on time and on their own.
From a student’s perspective, University maintains many goals. These goals fall especially into of Horace Mann’s categories of intellectual and moral education. University upholds 6 core values, one of these being mutual respect. Respect for your elders, peers, and inferiors is a value impressed upon all community members in University. Respect creates a trusting environment within University. There are no locks on the lockers and no one even uses a locker during an organized sport practice. The students are trusted to respect each other and their peer’s property. They are given respect by their superiors, the teachers.
Part of what makes University so challenging is the expected student responsibility. Students must make it to class on time, no bells for reminding. Students must find their daily homework assignments. And the teachers at University high school trust their students to do their homework on time and on their own.
Friday, February 15, 2008
presentations day 2
Looking back on the two days of presentations there are a few examples that stick in my mind. Eli had some great pictures but my favorite would have to be the picture of a Farmers market in Portland, Oregon. Every product is displayed for people to be enticed by and there are a lot of little markets because then there is more of a variety for people to buy. His strongest point about this picture though was in Portland Oregon most people are “hippy”. All-natural, homegrown, fresh foods appeal to Oregon’s population.
I also thought a couple of Allie’s pictures were quite interesting. My favorite of all was the picture of Jordan, Steven, and Jamie with linked arms. This picture made it seem like Jordan, Steven, and Jamie were all the best of friends and having so much fun together. . But before she snapped this photo Jamie had thrown a rock at Steven. Jordan was in between them to get them to make up and be friends. Allie’s point was that even though you think you know exactly what is happening from some pictures, they can be misleading. I thought this was a clever example of exactly that.
Alex’s presentation was really interesting as well. He made a lot of good points about politics and University. His best example of rhetoric was probably the folder University gives to new students. 5 of the 12 pictures in the folder featured Britney in them. Aaaaand the largest picture on the cover is of Bwill talking to Mr. Cirek. Alex’s point was this is not coincidental but used for rhetorical appeal an prospective new families. I would even take his example Bwill even further to say Bwill excels at volleyball and basketball, takes AP classes, is quite charismatic and exotically beautiful. Not to mention black. She is a perfect candidate to put on university’s cover because she is not only a black student here, but she is a successful black student here. University wants here to represent us on the cover of something because of what she looks like AND who she is.
I also thought a couple of Allie’s pictures were quite interesting. My favorite of all was the picture of Jordan, Steven, and Jamie with linked arms. This picture made it seem like Jordan, Steven, and Jamie were all the best of friends and having so much fun together. . But before she snapped this photo Jamie had thrown a rock at Steven. Jordan was in between them to get them to make up and be friends. Allie’s point was that even though you think you know exactly what is happening from some pictures, they can be misleading. I thought this was a clever example of exactly that.
Alex’s presentation was really interesting as well. He made a lot of good points about politics and University. His best example of rhetoric was probably the folder University gives to new students. 5 of the 12 pictures in the folder featured Britney in them. Aaaaand the largest picture on the cover is of Bwill talking to Mr. Cirek. Alex’s point was this is not coincidental but used for rhetorical appeal an prospective new families. I would even take his example Bwill even further to say Bwill excels at volleyball and basketball, takes AP classes, is quite charismatic and exotically beautiful. Not to mention black. She is a perfect candidate to put on university’s cover because she is not only a black student here, but she is a successful black student here. University wants here to represent us on the cover of something because of what she looks like AND who she is.
Day one of Presentations
The AP Class’s examples of rhetoric were very thought provoking. From Mallory’s examples of Victoria’s secret and Gap Body to Derek’s use of Hollister, I was surprised by how much rhetoric I see in my daily life but don’t notice.
I liked Mallory’s presentation most because you could tell she put a lot of time and effort into finding examples to present to us. Her strongest example of rhetoric was Victoria’s Secret. She pointed out that Victoria’s Secret originally had the Pink section facing the main entrance to the mall then they replaced it with the more risqué section. This is an example of the most obvious use of rhetoric in advertising, sex sells. She then compared Victoria’s Secret to Gap Body, two very different stores in regards to public appearance. Victoria’s Secret featured a black border around the entrance to their store and had very life-like mannequins in sexual positions. Gap on the other hand featured a picture with a woman smiling happily wearing almost all white. The word over the photograph was Love. I would never have noticed any of these appeals to rhetoric had Mallory not pointed them out. Gap sells love and creativity (another example in her presentation) while Victoria’s Secret sells sex and naughtiness. This section of her presentation obviously required thought before and after she went to the mall. Mallory very observantly exposed subtle approaches that gap and Victoria’s Secret used for enticing the American public to their stores.
Derek also exemplified a stores use of sex to sell products. Derek pointed out that Hollister used loud music and sexy half-naked mannequins to appeal to America’s younger generation. I believe Ethan had an example of a Hollister mannequin without a shirt on and almost part of its genitals hanging out. On most days that I go to the mall I probably walk past a mannequin just like it and don’t notice any of these rhetorical arguments.
I liked Mallory’s presentation most because you could tell she put a lot of time and effort into finding examples to present to us. Her strongest example of rhetoric was Victoria’s Secret. She pointed out that Victoria’s Secret originally had the Pink section facing the main entrance to the mall then they replaced it with the more risqué section. This is an example of the most obvious use of rhetoric in advertising, sex sells. She then compared Victoria’s Secret to Gap Body, two very different stores in regards to public appearance. Victoria’s Secret featured a black border around the entrance to their store and had very life-like mannequins in sexual positions. Gap on the other hand featured a picture with a woman smiling happily wearing almost all white. The word over the photograph was Love. I would never have noticed any of these appeals to rhetoric had Mallory not pointed them out. Gap sells love and creativity (another example in her presentation) while Victoria’s Secret sells sex and naughtiness. This section of her presentation obviously required thought before and after she went to the mall. Mallory very observantly exposed subtle approaches that gap and Victoria’s Secret used for enticing the American public to their stores.
Derek also exemplified a stores use of sex to sell products. Derek pointed out that Hollister used loud music and sexy half-naked mannequins to appeal to America’s younger generation. I believe Ethan had an example of a Hollister mannequin without a shirt on and almost part of its genitals hanging out. On most days that I go to the mall I probably walk past a mannequin just like it and don’t notice any of these rhetorical arguments.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Bomb.com
All of the commercials were bomb diggity. My favorite by far was Eli, Tony, Jordan, and Christina’s group. Not that everyone else’s was inferior…but Eli, Tony, Jordan, and Christina’s was superior. I’ll admit, I am a sucker for comedy. If you can make me laugh I like you. The same goes with commercials, the commercial made me laugh, I might consider paying more attention to the commercial which may lead to me buying the product. My favorite part of the whole commercial was near the end when Tony would say his line in an extra excited voice. But then again I really really liked the beginning with Eli. I cannot decide.
On a more serious note, I thought Allie’s, Tina’s, Nick’s, and Alex’s was quite effective as well. I liked that they presented a more serious commercial toward my age group. To me it meant they took my opinions and what I wanted seriously. A very good appeal to pathos. They also targeted vast majorities of my age group personally by featuring a basketball player, a smarty-pants, and a regular ol’ kid as people drinking their product and enjoying it.
The last commercial I want to talk about is the car commercial. The graphics were aesthetically pleasing and made the car so much more “cooler”. I feel like you depended on the greatness of your graphics mostly though. As visually tantalizing as the commercial was it didn’t engage me completely. My personality is the type that I like a lot of drama or jokes to catch my attention and I don’t really like cars. My lack of interest in the commercial could have been related to one or the other or both. I want you all to understand that it was evident that lots and lots of work went into the commercial which is what made the commercial so good.
On a more serious note, I thought Allie’s, Tina’s, Nick’s, and Alex’s was quite effective as well. I liked that they presented a more serious commercial toward my age group. To me it meant they took my opinions and what I wanted seriously. A very good appeal to pathos. They also targeted vast majorities of my age group personally by featuring a basketball player, a smarty-pants, and a regular ol’ kid as people drinking their product and enjoying it.
The last commercial I want to talk about is the car commercial. The graphics were aesthetically pleasing and made the car so much more “cooler”. I feel like you depended on the greatness of your graphics mostly though. As visually tantalizing as the commercial was it didn’t engage me completely. My personality is the type that I like a lot of drama or jokes to catch my attention and I don’t really like cars. My lack of interest in the commercial could have been related to one or the other or both. I want you all to understand that it was evident that lots and lots of work went into the commercial which is what made the commercial so good.
Pottery Barn
Pottery barn, like most retail companies, researches constantly to find a way to make the most durable and classic product but for a reasonable price. Pottery barn even goes to the extreme of creating a contest that requires teenagers to send in pictures of their rooms with the intent of enabling the pottery barn designers to see thousands of teenager’s rooms. This business of tricking thousands of American teens into sending in pictures of their private rooms I find a little creepy. I understand that the teens consensually send in these pictures but I can’t help but feel a little unsettled at the fact that Pottery Barn easily tricked a portion of America into sending in pictures of their private spaces, quite simply too. If Pottery Barn is capable of a maneuver like that, what exactly are other companies capable as well?
I think there are numerous positive aspects to this article as well though. To start mostly women with a position of power are featured in this article. I think it is awesome Pottery Barn is doing so well especially with a driving force like senior vice-president Celia Tejada behind it. Tejada runs her business with care and enthusiasm. Telling her staff they must be living life before coming to work creates a positive work environment. She also sends them out to flea markets and encourages them to throw dinner parties in order to take notice of what the guests like or need. Her staff must really respect her as a boss and therefore work harder for her. But this paragraph really has nothing to do with the rhetorical devices Pottery Barn uses in order to boost sales.
Pottery Barn targets not only the adult (ones with da money) demographic but the teens and children as well. Parents will buy what their children want therefore Pottery Barn cleverly makes products intended to entice the child’s or teen’s eye. They also keep their prices affordable. Who doesn’t like that?
I think there are numerous positive aspects to this article as well though. To start mostly women with a position of power are featured in this article. I think it is awesome Pottery Barn is doing so well especially with a driving force like senior vice-president Celia Tejada behind it. Tejada runs her business with care and enthusiasm. Telling her staff they must be living life before coming to work creates a positive work environment. She also sends them out to flea markets and encourages them to throw dinner parties in order to take notice of what the guests like or need. Her staff must really respect her as a boss and therefore work harder for her. But this paragraph really has nothing to do with the rhetorical devices Pottery Barn uses in order to boost sales.
Pottery Barn targets not only the adult (ones with da money) demographic but the teens and children as well. Parents will buy what their children want therefore Pottery Barn cleverly makes products intended to entice the child’s or teen’s eye. They also keep their prices affordable. Who doesn’t like that?
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Can't Argue With Abercrombie and Fitch
Targeting young white teens, Abercrombie and Fitch continues to annually rake in established annual sales of $3,318,158,000. I walk into the store and am bombarded with pictures of sexy muscular men sensually pushing their pants down, beautiful women eyeing the camera, and (my personal favorite) half-naked men and women intertwined on top of couches, in fields, and on beaches. Why use these photographs, erotic photographs to appeal to white 18-25 year olds? Are teenagers not extremely hormonal? Are teenage girls not the most self and body obsessed people? Why not! But A&F doesn’t just stop at the attractive pictures covering every wall (including within the dressing room), but makes sure to only hire ‘attractive’ workers as well. The dress code at A&F has recently been covered by CBS news. In the article A&F must reimburse prior A&F employees for clothing purchased in California stores during that period of time that employees worked there. Evidently, the employees were ‘encouraged’ to wear only Abercrombie clothing while on the job. If A&F only hires attractive employees why would they force their workers to wear only the A&F clothing? Hmmmm
All of Abercrombie and Fitches clothing is splattered with the A&F insignia and company name. Anyone (and I am completely including myself in this statement) who wears A&F clothing is basically a walking billboard. This is a wonderful rhetorical device used on the American population because if an A&F item of clothing is being ogled at, the ogler will know where they can get an exact replica.
Now before you comment, know that everything I have just said totally applies to me and I am perfectly willing to admit it. I know A&F is (usually) overpriced and understaffed. I know I shouldn’t buy into the rhetorical argument A&F stores make. The point is, I like their clothing. I think it is attractive and I usually want it enough that I’ll buy it. I believe I buy the clothing simply because I like it but maybe there is some pathological manipulation I am unaware of here. To that, I give you another hmmmm…
All of Abercrombie and Fitches clothing is splattered with the A&F insignia and company name. Anyone (and I am completely including myself in this statement) who wears A&F clothing is basically a walking billboard. This is a wonderful rhetorical device used on the American population because if an A&F item of clothing is being ogled at, the ogler will know where they can get an exact replica.
Now before you comment, know that everything I have just said totally applies to me and I am perfectly willing to admit it. I know A&F is (usually) overpriced and understaffed. I know I shouldn’t buy into the rhetorical argument A&F stores make. The point is, I like their clothing. I think it is attractive and I usually want it enough that I’ll buy it. I believe I buy the clothing simply because I like it but maybe there is some pathological manipulation I am unaware of here. To that, I give you another hmmmm…
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Live Your Dreams!
I forced myself to sit through the lamest teen romance movie in order to fully understand the meaning of this phrase. I watched Save The Last dance airing on TBS from noon to 2pm. The movie was as cheesy and cliché as ever and the commercials were no better. I watched commercials about fast-food restaurants, osteoporosis and birth control pills, and make up. All had interesting implicit and explicit rhetoric within the commercial. The osteoporosis commercial featured Sally Hansen playing with children and sitting on her picnic table endorsing the pills to strengthen bones. The creators of this commercial used Sally Hansen because she appeals to the middle age female audience. Middle-aged America has grown up with Sally Hansen and it’s comforting to them that Sally’s bones are deteriorating just like theirs. This commercial ties directly in with all of the make up commercials I saw as well. Every single make up commercial that aired featured a celebrity endorsing the product. Jessica Alba for cover up, Sarah Jessica Parker for hair dye, and Vanessa Hudgens for facial cleanser. The creators of these commercials ingeniously use celebrities as an appeal to women because these celebrities are culturally considered pretty. The faces of Alba, Parker, and Hudgens are everywhere, mocking women as if to say, “This is Beautiful”. If companies put these “beautiful” women on TV literally saying, “ I use “X” to wash my face” America will want to too. People may argue this rhetorical tactic doesn’t work, that America is smarter than simply going out to the store to buy something because a celebrity endorsed it. If this were true then why do companies still use this rhetorical tactic?
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Class Discussion on the Objectification of Women
The Wednesday class discussion on female objectification in the media went as expected. Nick thought the topic was a load of crap. Tony thought we would never be able to end it and even if we could where would the line be. When would we begin to censor too much? Alex defended the male end of the spectrum. The discussion was interesting and dull at the same time.
I love our English class’s in-class discussions. I think people say, for the most part, intelligent and well thought out comments. I enjoy arguing. I enjoy Lamags trying to hold back. I truly enjoy it all. But…I can’t help but get annoyed. I feel like we never really get anywhere with the discussions. I feel like no one truly listens to what the speaker has to say. I think checking out and calling the discussion crap wastes our time. I think giving up and saying ‘it makes money and it will never change so why are we arguing’ also wastes our time. I feel like some people hold so tightly to their opinions they refuse to listen to opposing ideas.
I think it’s important that we have discussions on topics as important as the objectification of women but I feel discouraged because I feel like we never get anywhere with them. I don’t need anyone to concede their opinion but I want participation. I felt almost felt disinterested during the conversation because I believe what I believe and no one said anything compelling to make me change my mind.
I love our English class’s in-class discussions. I think people say, for the most part, intelligent and well thought out comments. I enjoy arguing. I enjoy Lamags trying to hold back. I truly enjoy it all. But…I can’t help but get annoyed. I feel like we never really get anywhere with the discussions. I feel like no one truly listens to what the speaker has to say. I think checking out and calling the discussion crap wastes our time. I think giving up and saying ‘it makes money and it will never change so why are we arguing’ also wastes our time. I feel like some people hold so tightly to their opinions they refuse to listen to opposing ideas.
I think it’s important that we have discussions on topics as important as the objectification of women but I feel discouraged because I feel like we never get anywhere with them. I don’t need anyone to concede their opinion but I want participation. I felt almost felt disinterested during the conversation because I believe what I believe and no one said anything compelling to make me change my mind.
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
The Objectification of Women
Jean Kilbourne does her homework! The ads compiled in her article “Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurts”; Advertising and Violence are in your face and undeniably offensive. The women labeled as bitches, the grabbing and groping by men, and worst yet, the children and pre-adolescent looking women. Kilbourne does not only compile all these ads together for shock value but for a connection to national statistics of rapes and the sexual harassment of women across the country. Kilbourne ties the statistics or personal narratives in different ways.
A Smirnoff Vodka ad pictures “a wolf hiding in a flock of sheep, a hideous grin on his face.” The first thought to mind is “beware a wolf in sheep’s clothing”. The ad blatantly is stating you can be a wolf in sheep’s clothing if you are drinking their product. But who would want to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing while drinking vodka? Kilbourne then hits the reader with statistics of sexual assault cases that involved alcohol by the perpetrator, victim, or both. It cannot be ignored what this ad was explicitly telling it’s consumers.
I don’t want to focus mainly on Kilbournes facts on the objectification of women, but I’d like to explore objectification of men too. In the article Kilbourne speaks of males commonly portrayed as bumbling idiots or as sexual objects as well. I think this point is valid but quite as concrete as her points for female objectification. True, men are objectified in the media as well, but what is the tie to male sexual assaults or harassment? I don’t mean minimize the problem, I just think the objectification of males is minimal compared to the objectification of women. There is indeed a difference.
A Smirnoff Vodka ad pictures “a wolf hiding in a flock of sheep, a hideous grin on his face.” The first thought to mind is “beware a wolf in sheep’s clothing”. The ad blatantly is stating you can be a wolf in sheep’s clothing if you are drinking their product. But who would want to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing while drinking vodka? Kilbourne then hits the reader with statistics of sexual assault cases that involved alcohol by the perpetrator, victim, or both. It cannot be ignored what this ad was explicitly telling it’s consumers.
I don’t want to focus mainly on Kilbournes facts on the objectification of women, but I’d like to explore objectification of men too. In the article Kilbourne speaks of males commonly portrayed as bumbling idiots or as sexual objects as well. I think this point is valid but quite as concrete as her points for female objectification. True, men are objectified in the media as well, but what is the tie to male sexual assaults or harassment? I don’t mean minimize the problem, I just think the objectification of males is minimal compared to the objectification of women. There is indeed a difference.
Monday, January 28, 2008
I Want My Whopper!
I contemplated which show aired on public television would be best to watch for a racy controversial commercial. I decided on Family Guy. I figured the audience targeted audience is young and primarily male. (I realize this may be a gross generalization). I found the show somewhat interesting and the commercials even worse. It was hard to pay attention to the commercials and try and find a good one to blog on. I caught a stupendous one though. Burger King is constantly advertising the whopper. I do remember that from my wonderful cable-filled days. The one I saw featured (I’m assuming) actual Burger King customers trying to purchase a whopper. In some instances their whopper was prepared incorrectly or in others the Burger King employee simply gave them a hard time (what exactly happens isn’t all too clear). The commercials main air time is used for the customer’s reaction to the less-then-satisfactory service. Most of the customer reactions depict them getting angry and eventually asking for the manager. In one part of the commercial, a man even says, “I just want my whopper”, or something along those lines.
I am choosing to blog about this particular commercial because the creators of the commercial cleverly use the stigma of fast-food bad service as a point in their rhetorical argument. The people who haven’t gotten their correct order, i.e. the whopper, seem incredibly irate. Burger King’s advertisement is even though these people are angry they are receiving bad service, they just want their whopper. That is just how good the whopper is. Taking an opposing argument and spinning it to fit your argument I think is the hardest use of rhetoric. The creators of this advertisement cleverly did just that.
I am choosing to blog about this particular commercial because the creators of the commercial cleverly use the stigma of fast-food bad service as a point in their rhetorical argument. The people who haven’t gotten their correct order, i.e. the whopper, seem incredibly irate. Burger King’s advertisement is even though these people are angry they are receiving bad service, they just want their whopper. That is just how good the whopper is. Taking an opposing argument and spinning it to fit your argument I think is the hardest use of rhetoric. The creators of this advertisement cleverly did just that.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Maggie Dooley's Thoughts on
University High School’s Student Written and Directed Plays
“Playing the Pronoun Game”
I, Maggie Dooley, felt an extreme sense of pride as I watched Friday night’s first play. I did not know the nature of any of the four plays beforehand so let’s just say this one shocked me. First off, Tina rocked. I loved her as Maggie, a perfect part for her. Elise did well, however I think she rushed her lines a little. Ian and Daniel were stupendous. I was cracking up whenever the two were on stage. I want to commend all four of these students for their bravery. It takes guts to go onto a lighted stage and kiss a member of the opposite sex. I plan on speaking to Elise about this play and ask her where she got some of her ideas for the characters. I wish the play would have delved a little deeper into what it was like AFTER the kiss for Maggie and Kristen but I suppose Elise wanted to keep the play short and somewhat light. This play was a great start to my night.
“Being or not Being”
“Being or Not Being” was incredibly Henry-esque. I didn’t quite follow the plot line, I definitely missed some of the jokes, and it was incredibly short. I laughed at Elise’s line of “Female.” In regards to Ian’s question of what gender she was. Other than that the play left a bit to be desired. Jim Ray? Evidently I have to see Henry, Rory, and Jim’s YouTube video in order to get that joke. I think Henry is a terribly funny guy and I was really excited to see his written and directed play. “Being or Not Being” definitely fell short of my expectations. I don’t mean to rip on Henry; I just see more potential in his silly head.
“If Books Could Kill”
I have mixed feeling for this play. J.P. Mershon played a wonderful Joshua. Elise did well as Aurora or Rory for short. I will admit this play was difficult to follow however. I understand (from speaking with LaMags after) that Rory was a figment of Joshua’s imagination and Joshua was the killer but I would not have come to this conclusion on my own. After play 1 and 2, I wasn’t ready for something that required a lot of consideration. However, I liked the surprise ending and I liked the play within a play. Once again, nice job Elise.
“Heaven”
My most favorite play ever presented by University High School is the play “Heaven” written and directed by Elise Lockwood. Tony Minott was perfect as Issac Newton. Daniel Hellman cracked me up as Charles. I am pretty sure I caught most of the nuances the Elise cleverly slipped in but I’m sure some went amiss. The jokes about Jesus and the names God and Yahweh were witty and interesting. The whole idea behind the play is somewhat controversial but I believe those kinds of ideas need to be presented. The possibility of our ‘higher being’ as two bumbling fools is pretty unlikely but at least this play will get you to wonder what is going on ‘up there’. That sort of wonderment is important understanding life. What happens when we die is a vital question many don’t consider. I commend Elise for taking the risk of putting on this play but doing it with grace and wit.
“Playing the Pronoun Game”
I, Maggie Dooley, felt an extreme sense of pride as I watched Friday night’s first play. I did not know the nature of any of the four plays beforehand so let’s just say this one shocked me. First off, Tina rocked. I loved her as Maggie, a perfect part for her. Elise did well, however I think she rushed her lines a little. Ian and Daniel were stupendous. I was cracking up whenever the two were on stage. I want to commend all four of these students for their bravery. It takes guts to go onto a lighted stage and kiss a member of the opposite sex. I plan on speaking to Elise about this play and ask her where she got some of her ideas for the characters. I wish the play would have delved a little deeper into what it was like AFTER the kiss for Maggie and Kristen but I suppose Elise wanted to keep the play short and somewhat light. This play was a great start to my night.
“Being or not Being”
“Being or Not Being” was incredibly Henry-esque. I didn’t quite follow the plot line, I definitely missed some of the jokes, and it was incredibly short. I laughed at Elise’s line of “Female.” In regards to Ian’s question of what gender she was. Other than that the play left a bit to be desired. Jim Ray? Evidently I have to see Henry, Rory, and Jim’s YouTube video in order to get that joke. I think Henry is a terribly funny guy and I was really excited to see his written and directed play. “Being or Not Being” definitely fell short of my expectations. I don’t mean to rip on Henry; I just see more potential in his silly head.
“If Books Could Kill”
I have mixed feeling for this play. J.P. Mershon played a wonderful Joshua. Elise did well as Aurora or Rory for short. I will admit this play was difficult to follow however. I understand (from speaking with LaMags after) that Rory was a figment of Joshua’s imagination and Joshua was the killer but I would not have come to this conclusion on my own. After play 1 and 2, I wasn’t ready for something that required a lot of consideration. However, I liked the surprise ending and I liked the play within a play. Once again, nice job Elise.
“Heaven”
My most favorite play ever presented by University High School is the play “Heaven” written and directed by Elise Lockwood. Tony Minott was perfect as Issac Newton. Daniel Hellman cracked me up as Charles. I am pretty sure I caught most of the nuances the Elise cleverly slipped in but I’m sure some went amiss. The jokes about Jesus and the names God and Yahweh were witty and interesting. The whole idea behind the play is somewhat controversial but I believe those kinds of ideas need to be presented. The possibility of our ‘higher being’ as two bumbling fools is pretty unlikely but at least this play will get you to wonder what is going on ‘up there’. That sort of wonderment is important understanding life. What happens when we die is a vital question many don’t consider. I commend Elise for taking the risk of putting on this play but doing it with grace and wit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)